You are here: Foswiki>Adesa Web>NextMeetings>TelCo2 (05 Apr 2007, StefanScheidl)Edit Attach

Partners Invited

StefanScheidl, NikolayMehandjiev, AlexanderHaemmerle, VolkmarPipek, IainStalker, ChristianDoerner, AlistairSutcliffe, FabioCasati, PaoloTraverso, MarcoPistore

Partners Present

StefanScheidl (minutes), NikolayMehandjiev, AlexanderHaemmerle, ChristianDoerner, AlistairSutcliffe

abbreviations used


(a) Discussion of USayObjectives

  • objectives to measure progress of consortium
  • additional objective: domain-specific metaphors, languages
  • prototype will wil DODE with integrated collaboration, search, meta-data repository
  • aim: generic architecture (technical), populated with rules, knowledge base
  • thus 2-level delivery
  • ideally address two separate domains for separation of general and domain-specific parts

action items:
  • NM to revise objectives according to discussion

(b) Discussion of WpStructure

  • WP1: driven by PF; generic, due 2007-04-19 (Alex on holiday next week, back on April 16)
  • WP2: driven by task leaders,
    • T2.1: SAP due 2007-04-12
    • T2.2: driven by US, UM interested in task 2.2, due 2007-04-12
    • new T2.3: collab reqs
  • WP3: new scope: domain-independent part of DODOE (WPL: UM, SAP, US?)
    • conceptual domain-independent apescts of DODE
    • new T3.1 community support
    • new T3.2 mixed initiave
    • former T3.1 moved to WP2
    • former T3.3 moved to WP4
  • WP4: architectural concepts (domain specific)
    • T4.1: lead, UM, contrib. SAP, PF
    • T4.2: UM
    • T4.3: lead US, interested PF
  • WP5:
    • T4.1 goes to WP2
    • T4.2 goes to WP3
    • T4.3 goes ???
  • WP6: integrated prototype...
    • SAP to develop task structure by 2007-04-12
  • WP7: intrest by US
    • T6.1 Continuous Integration and Testing - TL: SAP goes to WP6
  • WP8: exploit and diss:
    • T8.1 exploit: lead SAP
    • T8.2 dissemination: lead UM
    • T8.3 integration with EU research activities

(c) Updates re: OurPartners

  • Trento out (under water)
  • G. Engels (Paderborn) would be suitable, but additional German partner problematic. We could approach former group members
  • HP unlikey to participate
  • Deutsche Post: interested, but not decided
    • action item: CD to pursue Deutsche Post, urgently
  • alternative: Telecordia
  • voestalpine: interested, decision expected by Easter
  • SME participation: PF as single SME sufficient?
    • PF to check for additional partners in network
  • Brad Myers (Carnegie Mellon): very interested, but funding problem (US). Open issue: regular partner or subcontracting?
    • action items: NM, Kurt to contact NCPs for subcontracting issues

(d) Allocating responsibilities for ProposalSections

action items:
  • all: partner descriptions, due 2007-04-12
  • WPLs, TLs: provide task descriptions, deliverables, time plan, (risks), due 2007-04-12

(e) Any other Business

-- NikolayMehandjiev - 05 Apr 2007
Topic revision: r2 - 05 Apr 2007, StefanScheidl
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback